DON’T STOP BELIEVING: ROCK OF AGES
It has been more than a month since my last review and God only knows how much I have missed writing here. But between starting a new job and contributing to online magazines, I did not have any time left to come up with my usual two to four critics. Although I feel a bit guilty to have sort of abandoned this place for so long, I have to say I am very glad to have published elsewhere ; including a piece titled Tom Cruise : the Jesus of cinema ? for Brain Magazine. For non french readers, I basically claimed that you can hate the man, but you can’t in good faith hate the actor because he is undeniably a brillant one. Yeah I know, you have heard it all before!
</<span>I am not a musical lover. I gave in to a friend’s offer and saw Hair in London but it is a whole other story for me to put myself through one on the big screen. I did not like Moulin Rouge and was profoundly appaled by Mamma Mia which I found vulgar. I haven’t even see The Sound of Music. I guess it says it all. But when I heard that Tom Cruise will be singing some Bon Jovi in his upcoming flick, I whispered out loud “dreams do come true”. Only in my wildest fantasy one of my all-time favorite actor would be covering the band I reletentssly listen to. How was I then supposed to pass on a movie taking place in the 80’s filled with the tunes on constant rotation on my Ipod? I simply could not resist and ended up seeing it not once, or twice but three times.
The cinematic adaptation of the musical of the same name, Rock of Ages narrates the story of two teenagers trying to become rock idols in Los Angeles in the 80’s. A tale of romance, hope and desillusion expressed through hair bands’ hits, it has become a legendary production played in Broadway and in The West End. As it is always the case with cult-classics, redoing them is a dangerous exercise. Having not seen the stage production, I did not have any expectation towards the conservation of the original plot and characters’ stories. However, I was concerned about the esthetic and overall atmosphere of the film, fearing for it to be too cheesy, too cliché like the promotional poster which looked poorly engaging. The 80’s is a period that is very rarely well-represented in cinema and TV shows, directors and costumes designers always feeling the need to perpetuate the on-going image of a decade of bad fashion and hair styles. Alright, it was maybe the case, but does it have to always be exaggerated? A tempered depiction of the aesthetic of this time, not unbearable vocals performances, a good soundtrack and a decent storyline were the four things I wanted out of Rock of Ages. I got it all.
Before telling you the reasons why I could not fight the desire to see this film again, I have to address its negative points. My adoration for Tom Cruise and everything 80’s has not prevented me from acknowledging the flaws of Rock of Ages. As it is now a characteristic of today’s movies, it is way too long. There is a good thirty minutes that should have not made the final cut. At each of my viewing, I felt bored at the same moment and my friends told me they also experienced this lapse of interest too. The other thing that bothered was the acting of the two central protagonists, Diego Boneta and Julianne Hough. To be blunt, they were really bad. Their limited skills in this domain is less painful to witness as the movies goes by though as the great humoristic scenes and songs take the attention away from them. Nevertheless, I don’t necessarily believe they were miscast. They do come alive when they sing and there is a sweetness – or naivity - and an enthusiastic energy coming from them that really translates into the picture, making their characters likable.
I guess this remark could be applied to the movie in its ensemble. Rock of Ages only appears as being bad, perhaps because in this days and age, everything from the 80’s – with the exception of Back to the Future – is considered as such by definition. But, if you give it a chance to be good, if you allow yourself to not label it as cheesy and stupid from the very start, then you might accept it as a pleasant and highly entertaining film.
</<p class=”MsoNormal”>
More over, Tom Cruise and Catherine Zeta-Jones acted the hell out of their characters. They are both possessed and obviously having a lot of fun respectively incarnating a rock ‘n roll legend and the mayor of L.A’s wife scheming to shut him down. It is rightly so that the press has applauded the job Cruise did in Rock of Ages as he really, really, really went the extra mile to give life to Stacee Jaxx in all his glory. Being a long6time fan accustomed to him pushing boundaries, I could not help my jaw from dropping when I saw the first shot of him in the film. Or should I say, the first shot of his genital area tightened in a leather dominatrix jump suit. Although I found him sexy, I was surprised to not have spent the time drooling about how good-looking he is with long hair but rather empathizing with his character. He perhaps managed to turn into Stacee Jaxx so easily because he could understand, relate to his life, struggles and controversies. When he explains to the Rolling Stones magazine’s journalist (Malin Akerman) that he is a prisoner of rock ‘n roll, that the projections of the public on him, of who he is, prevent him from saving his soul and finding love, I thought that he was very much like talking about his existence. Maybe when he told her about how it is really like to be Stacee Jaxx, he was telling her how it is to be Tom Cruise.
Although it can’t be deny that Cruise stole the show, it is worth mentioning the quality of everybody else involvement. Brand provided great comic moments, especially in his duo with Alec Baldwin who himself was credible as a temple of rock decadence’s owner. Paul Giamatti was simply brilliant. I did not enjoy him in Cosmopolis because, well, I was bored out of my mind by the film, but I found him absolutely on spot in his depiction of a greedy manager looking for his next golden goose.
Credits : timetoputonashow, theaterboy1.